From: Darac Marjal <mailingl...@darac.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:07:38 +0000
> This being a Wireless connection, it's more likely to be signal
> strength.
My original thought also.
> ... no attenuation = 100% ...
I don't understand. Any received signal which is too weak to
saturate the receiver should not need attenuation. Every such
signal is marked as 100%? Whereas any signal which saturates
the receiver will be attenuated. Such signal is marked as less
than 100%? Seems counter intuitive.
> Don't expect to see either [0% or 100%] value as a result.
The 100% annotation appears frequently. Sometimes a smaller
percentage can be raised by moving closer to the access point.
I don't recall ever seeing a percentage less than about 35.
Appears this is another instance where the best documentation
is the source code. Thanks for the interest and discussion,
... Peter E.
--
123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 12
Tel +13606390202 Bcc: peasthope at shaw.ca http://carnot.yi.org/
"http://members.shaw.ca/peasthope/index.html#Itinerary "
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/171057898.31480.26921@cantor.invalid
