On Apr 19, 2013 8:11 PM, "Hans-J. Ullrich" <hans.ullr...@loop.de> wrote: > > Whatever I see in all your comments is this: > > Most of the people show a big uptime. 100 days, 400 days, 500 days, even more > than a 1000 days! So many people do this. It proves, how stable a good system > can be and it also shows the great work of the developers. > > If I compare it to other commercial systems (aka Windows). you can see the > high quality, what people can do, if they like and have fun, what they are > doing. > > Money is no garant for quality. It is freedom, it is fun and it is motivation. > > So let's all work together, to keep these things. > > Let us say to all developers and their helpers: > > Thank you very much for all the work and help we got from you!!! > > Best regards > > Hans > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201304191910.56696.hans.ullr...@loop.de >
Windows web servers (IIS) *need* to be rebooted nightly. Initially I thought that was only true for IIS 5/6. However it turns out you'll have to go back to the old habits also on the new and improved IIS 7 and 7.5. :-) Is it bad code of the developers who write the sites? Is it the same old habits of the developers writing IIS, or the program managers who deliver IIS? I have no idea. Thing is that on heavily used systems things go bad and they magically start working again after a reboot. Worst than this (maybe?) is that I'm starting to get the impression that clustered hyper-v servers might also need scheduled reboots. :-) And I have a Raspberry PI with Debian with an uptime of more than 100 days. True, I'm only using it as an bind+dhcp server but still.. Long live Debian and the philosophy behind it! -- Sent from my Brick (TM)