On Thu, 30 May 2013 01:32:27 +1200 Chris Bannister <cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz> wrote:
> I am fairly sure that aptitude came AFTER synaptic! While I don't argue with that (I started using Debian when etch was testing), on my Debian system changelogs for aptitude and synaptic clearly show that aptitude was first, and synaptic was second: aptitude (0.0.6a-1) unstable; urgency=low * Initial Release. -- Daniel Burrows <daniel_burr...@brown.edu> Sun, 6 Feb 2000 12:58:13 -0500 synaptic (0.16-1) unstable; urgency=low * Initial Release (closes: #115167) -- Michael Vogt <m...@debian.org> Tue, 13 Nov 2001 23:17:20 +0100 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130529203900.0bf1af29a4e2dfa341d32...@gmail.com
