On Sunday 07 July 2013 00:31:41 Charlie wrote: > On Sat, 6 Jul 2013 22:36:59 +0100 "Lisi Reisz [email protected]" > sent this: > > >On Saturday 06 July 2013 22:24:34 Stephen Allen wrote: > >> I have it working here fine on Debian's Chromium. > > > >Does it matter? > > > >Lisi > > I think it must Lisi, because someone posted about a problem with Chrome > and the discussion was taken from that to Chromium not being "nearly" > the same and then about things not working in Chromium or Chrome and so > it continued. > > So I imagine it does matter.
Yes, Charlie. I agree. I had been involved in the discussion and agree that that discussion matters. And most people were saying that they found flash-plugin-nonfree adequate, with which I did not disagree. It was not adequate for me, it was for them. Worth establishing. And it may well have been my fault that I did not find it satisfactory. <Quote from Stephen> What do you mean exactly? It just does, if you have it installed. You must go to Adobe's website and install it first of course. I have it working here fine on Debian's Chromium. </quote> But Stephen appeared to me to want confrontation for confrontation's sake, and it was that with which I was disagreeing. Of course I know about having to get it and install it before it would work! It appeared to me as if he was being deliberately insulting. So I repeat: Does it matter that Stephen, clever Stephen, has it working to his satisfaction, so assumes that I am too thick to know that something is not going to work unless I first download and install it? I still say not! Lisi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
