Le 08.10.2013 22:42, Sven Joachim a écrit :
On 2013-10-08 19:06 +0200, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Since I had to reinstall from my last kernel error, I decided to
stay
with stable on that computer, but I need some softwares in less
outdated versions, like development libraries or i3 ( this one is
not
a need but a question of comfort, I admit ), so I want to use
apt-pining.
I have set all packages from stable to a priority of 900 and testing
packages with 500.
But tzdata wants to upgrade, for an unknown reason. Explicitly
making
it to a priority of 900 for stable fixes that, but I can not
understand why it is needed?
I don't know either, but "apt-cache policy tzdata" should explain it.
Cheers,
Sven
Thanks for the hint, I had forgotten about apt-cache policy.
I finally understood, why the update was on the run:
tzdata:
Installé : 2013d-0wheezy1
Candidat : 2013d-1
Table de version :
2013d-1 0
500 http://ftp2.fr.debian.org/debian/ testing/main amd64
Packages
*** 2013d-0wheezy1 0
500 http://ftp2.fr.debian.org/debian/ stable-updates/main amd64
Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
2013c-0wheezy1 0
900 http://ftp2.fr.debian.org/debian/ stable/main amd64
Packages
Version 2013d-0wheezy1 had the same priority as testing one so testing
was installed because more recent.
Now, I wonder why I have 3 versions of that package listed when I only
have 2 sources enabled? Could it be because of stable, stable/updates
and stable-updates repositories? ( I am not used to stable, so I do not
have the "updates" repos usually )
And also why I have a wheezy version with a priority of 500... I can
not even find the 2013d-0wheezy1 in debian packages...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/9dc2fe2bca18a98dd48abc1de5313...@neutralite.org