Am 11.10.2013 um 21:19 schrieb Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net>:
> On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 20:44:11 +0200, Tom H <tomh0...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Ralf Mardorf >> <ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net> wrote: >> > >>> GVFS is absolutely optional software. >> >> You only ever consider things from your limited use-case > > No. > >> Simply because you mount external drives manually >> or via udev-without-gvfs, doesn't mean that this is the best way for >> the majority. > > It's better to install software that damages the drives instead? > Why not making it optional, as it's done for Xfce's Thunar? Just for interest: Why does it damage the drives? My usual use-cases are: Have some external HDDs dedicated for music, foto-this, foto-that, a dozen of USB-sticks, and a dozen of SD-cards for cameras etc. Data is copied between them, i.e. I plug in the device, open the file-browser etc. Then unmount/remove the storage media. As I need to do this cross-OS (Debian, Win XP/7, OSX), both Win and OSX write their hidden files crap on the devices. Helmut Wollmersdorfer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/fb04206a-d458-4cba-a741-1fc969557...@fixpunkt.de
