On 27/11/13 13:49, David L. Craig wrote: > On 13Nov26:1545-0500, David L. Craig wrote: > >> On 13Nov26:1437-0500, Mark Haase wrote: >> >>> Therefore, a Linux distribution has 2 choices: (1) wait for upstream >>> patches for bugs/vulnerabilities as they are found, or (2) recompile all >>> packages with optimizations disabled. I don't think proposal #2 would get >>> very far... >> >> Well, there's always -O1 as opposed to no optimization. >> BTW, -O1 is the minimum permitted for making gcc or glibc, >> I forget which. > > I'm rebuilding glibc 2.18 now with -O1 after it refused -O0,
> but binutils 2.23.2, gcc 4.8.1, and g++ 4.8.1 are fine with > -O0. > And what was the result of poptck (STACK) when you tested them? Kind regards -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/529565ca.9070...@gmail.com
