On 20131231_100040, Reco wrote: > On Mon, 30 Dec 2013 16:41:17 -0700 > Paul E Condon <pecon...@mesanetworks.net> wrote: > > > > Can you post the output of 'aptitude why p11-kit' please? > > > > > > Reco > > In answer to your question: > > root@big:/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu# aptitude why p11-kit > > Unable to find a reason to install p11-kit. > > > > But also, according to aptitude, p11-kit is in status 'p', > > i.e. not installed at all. So what is generating the message???? > > This seems to be an important clue, and I have no idea what > > to do because of it. > > Ok, now it is starting to get interesting. gnome-keyring by itself is a > process which should store user credentials. gnome-keyring-pkcs11.so is > a library that (judging by name) is called by PolicyKit and is linked > to a gnome-keyring-pkcs11.so. > > About the only reason that justifies storing user credentials if one > prints with CUPS is that unlikely case that one configures CUPS instead > of it. So, the message is harmless, and can be ignored. > > Still, something is calling gnome-keyring-pkcs11.so, and that leaves us > libgnome-keyring0. > > Can you post the output of 'aptitude why libgnome-keyring0' please? > > Reco
root@big:~# aptitude why libgnome-keyring0 i gnome-disk-utility Depends libgnome-keyring0 (>= 2.22) I think I use disk-utility when formatting new disks to extN from Windows whatever. Does this indicate that I must choose between removing garbage warning messages and having a GUI disk utility pre-installed for occasional use? I hope not. Thanks. -- Paul E Condon pecon...@mesanetworks.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131231161126.gc11...@big.lan.gnu