2014-03-04 18:15 GMT+01:00 Paul E Condon <pecon...@mesanetworks.net>:
> On 20140304_160239, Raffaele Morelli wrote: > > 2014-03-04 15:45 GMT+01:00 Steve Litt of Troubleshooters.Com < > > litt...@gmail.com>: > > > > > On Tue, 4 Mar 2014 09:05:41 +0100 > > > Raffaele Morelli <raffaele.more...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Lately I would add > > > > > > > > :0B > > > > * .*(systemd) > > > > $GARBAGE > > > > > > > > :0 > > > > * ^Subject.*(systemd) > > > > $GARBAGE > > > > > > I can't do that, because I really need to know about that stuff. When > > > Jessie becomes stable, I'm going to try to work with systemd. But if > > > that becomes problematic, I'll need a plan B. A lot of today's traffic > > > was very informative stuff about system startup. > > > > > > > IMHO you won't need a plan B, it's just another system service manager, > > that said you can try systemd before Jessie release, it's in debian > > Wheezy... > > > > /r > > I switched to systemd under Wheezy a couple of weeks ago. I had a > small problem convincing aptitude to stop switching back to the old > way any time that I wanted to install packages from > security.debian.org. After fixing that I have noticed no difference > from the old way, whose name I have already forgotten. My hardware has > a built in, intended, delay before start of boot, so I don't percieve > that boot is faster. Maybe it is. I just can't see it in my particular > set up. I am much more worried now about the world going nuclear > before systemd gets a chance to prove its usefulness. > +1000 sometimes people on this list get somewhat horny when discussing those things, which are really subjective in the end... they go on with a mixture of tecno-steronic, 0.02$ philosophy which I can't stand :-( > > Peace to all, I hope > respect /raffaele
