-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2014-03-21 00:30, Patrick Bartek wrote: > On Thu, 20 Mar 2014, Ken Heard wrote: > >> [snip] I never did get LVM going on top of RAID1. Since I had to >> use an mini-ITX box there would not be room in it for more than >> the two hard drives already there and used for the RAID1. I >> consequently made a virtue out of necessity by deciding that I >> did not need LVM. If ever I need more hard drive space it will >> have to be external. > > I'm curious. Why would you want to use LVM with such a set up? > Seems pointless. Not advantageous. For a non-server situation. > Even if you do add additional hard drives (externally), they can be > mounted and used effectively by conventional means.
As I mentioned in one of my earlier posts, I made a virtue out of necessity and convinced myself that I did not really need it. If ever I need to expand hard drive capacity I will do what you suggest in your last sentence. Regards, Ken -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlMrw3YACgkQlNlJzOkJmTdYlwCeI3fJFqSY1gyxvyvu+8vAe75O +j8An19RfJJsuE1jqNfyYF+TJMD1auus =ZXVi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/532bc376.5090...@teksavvy.com
