Le 18/05/2014 08:34, Tom H a écrit : > On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Zenaan Harkness <z...@freedbms.net> wrote: >> Although initial tty session (from boot) is quicker than with >> sysvinit, additional tty sessions are very slow to start, in the order >> of 5 seconds (which seems like an eternity). >> >> Additionally, this slow tty/session creation time is seen when: >> *) exiting X - ie logout back to terminal (from startx) >> *) Shutdown from XFCE logout/shutdown dialog >> >> When exiting X from a startx at the linux tty, there appears to be a >> large session tear-down time. >> >> In addition, a similarly long duration is seen when (as stated) >> starting another linux vt. > By default, other than tty1 (via > "/etc/systemd/system/getty.target.wants/getty@tty1.service"), VTs are > started dynamically as needed. > > If you want tty2 to be available permanently and persistently through > reboots, run: > > systemctl enable getty@tty2.service > systemctl start getty@tty2.service > > The first command will create a > "/etc/systemd/system/getty.target.wants/getty@tty2.service" symlink to > "/lib/systemd/system/getty@.service", which is more or less similar > to, in the case of a hypothetical getty@tty2 sysvinit script, having > "update-rc.d enable getty@tty2" create > "/etc/rc{2,3,4,5}.d/Sabgetty@tty2" and "/etc/rc{0,6}.d/Kcdgetty@tty2" > symlinks to "/etc/init.d/getty@tty2". > >
And is there a way toi keep current behaviour : X session on tty 7 ? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5378d3b8.1030...@rail.eu.org