On Mon 30 Jun 2014 at 03:49:36 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2014-06-29 12:52:40 +0200, François Patte wrote: > > Le 29/06/2014 12:35, Brian a écrit : > > > If that is what you really want to do you are not going about it in > > > the right way. > > > > > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2014/05/msg01042.html > > > > Not sure of what you mean here... > > Not sure either what Brian meant.
We've had "Why should I install systemd?" and "OK but I am wondering why gthumb (and its dependencies) needs to install systemd". I thought a thread discussing the issue might be of interest. > > If it is that systemd is unavoidable, [...] > > The systemd package is not needed by gthumb's strict dependencies > (by "strict" I mean that you need to disable recommends explicitly). > But you may have other packages that, once upgraded to satisfy > dependencies, now depend on systemd (I would not be surprised). * policykit-1 depends on libpam-systemd * libpam-systemd depends on systemd-sysv or systemd-shim I don't think systemd-sysv is the issue here but installing systemd-shim allows the installation of sysvinit-core. > You could first try to remove all GNOME-related packages (since some > major GNOME components now depend on the systemd package[*]), then > upgrade your system to unstable, then reinstall gthumb without > recommends. I'd just say "yes"; preferably after a backup. It has been noted in the past that getting work done without a fuss and running unstable do not always go hand-in-hand. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/30062014115912.fa8654cfd...@desktop.copernicus.demon.co.uk