On Mon, 07 Jul 2014 21:08:32 +0200 Sven Joachim <svenj...@gmx.de> wrote:
> On 2014-07-07 20:51 +0200, Brian Sammon wrote: > > > So I would have to install/learn "sbuild". > > If you just want to rebuild packages locally, this is not really > necessary. Are you saying there's another way to do what I want to do? Or are you saying that the thing I think I want to do is maybe not really what I want to do? > Why do you want to rebuild the packages in the first place, and do you > want your local packages to be replaced by newer versions in the > archive? Well...the problem that I was trying to solve that prompted this question, has morphed into a different problem. If I decide to ask for help with that, I'll start another thread. But I thought this "+b1" technique might be useful in the future. In general, the situation is something like: I have an unsupported (by debian) ARMv7/armhf device with an unsupported (by Debian) kernel on it, and I wanted to run version X of package Foo that I downloaded from archive.debian.org. Later versions of package Foo have new features I don't like. I found a armhf binary of version X, but it wouldn't run, so I thought I'd see if rebuilding it from the source packages would help. It did -- the program runs now, but as it turns out that didn't solve my entire problem. Now my rebuilt version of package Foo -- that seems like exactly the right time to use a "+b1" version numbering trick. If it's not more trouble than it's worth. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140708043044.9763c3e7.debian-users-l...@brisammon.fastmail.fm
