On Sat, 09 Aug 2014 16:08:41 -0400 Gary Dale <[email protected]> wrote:
> Whatever for? There are better checksums and md5 doesn't provide error > correction? Even the MD5 man page advises using sha checksums instead. md5sum provides a relatively quick check... if it fails, then use the "real" check, i.e. pars. This saves [or seems to save] computing resources... However, it was just a suggestion... --Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
