Hi. On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 13:02:16 -0400 The Wanderer <wande...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 09/26/2014 at 12:26 PM, Steve Litt wrote: > > > On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 12:03:57 +0200 Martin Steigerwald > > <mar...@lichtvoll.de> wrote: > > >> Actually systemd has quite some features which benefits server > >> use. > >> > >> For example: > >> > >> 1) It groups services and shell sessions into process control > >> cgroups and shields them against each other CPU usage wise. > > >> 2) It is really good at catching the PIDs of the services it > >> runs, no matter what funny things they do like double forking. So > >> it exactly stops these PIDs and no others. > > >> 3) Compare systemctl service status with /etc/init.d/service > >> status. Its obvious that the systemctl output is way more useful > >> to administrators. > >> > >> > >> Can these be implemented elsewhere? I´d say yet for 1. Yet 2 and > >> partly 3 I think is the core of an init system. > > Agreed - definitely 2, maybe / maybe-not 3, and definitely not 1. 1 - libpam-cgroup 2 - daemontools, runit, many others. 3 - usability of 'systemctl status' feature is actually questionable, if you count in troubleshooting-over-phone usecase. In that case less is better than more. Reco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140926224104.cb03e7500306dfac2417c...@gmail.com
