Hi. On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 03:21:47AM -0700, Rusi Mody wrote: > On Monday, September 29, 2014 3:40:01 PM UTC+5:30, Reco wrote: > > Hi. > > > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 04:31:01PM +0200, lee wrote: > > > Debian already lost me (after over 15 years) when they came up with > > > their brokenarch and left users stranded with no possible fix for the > > > things they broke. The only reason I'm here is because I have it > > > running on my server, and the only reason I have it on my server is > > > because it was the only distribution of those I tried with which I could > > > get xen to work. I really didn't want to use Debian. > > > What's wrong with the current multiarch implementation in your option? > > I'm really curious as all multiarch complains I've seen so far (barring > > actual package limits) were easily solved just by reading an appropriate > > man page (or Debian wiki page). > > > A recent question of mine: > https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2014/08/msg01394.html
A fine example of dependency bug, if you ask my option. I'd report a bug against a package which caused such abnormal dependency (i.e. same package with two different arches). Reco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140929121633.GA24676@x101h
