On Sun 19 Oct 2014 at 00:05:08 +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote: > On 19/10/14 00:29, Reco wrote: > > Hi. > > > > On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 14:24:16 +0100 > > Brian <a...@cityscape.co.uk> wrote: > > > >> On Sat 18 Oct 2014 at 14:28:26 +0200, Peter Nieman wrote: > >> > >>> On 17/10/14 20:25, Brian wrote: > >>>> Why > >>>> it needs to be compiled without dbus is also unknown. > >>> > >>> You're asking the wrong question. The question you should ask > >>> yourself is: if claws-mail works perfectly well without dbus, then > >>> why does Debian ship a version that depends on it? > >> > >> claws-mail does not depend on dbus. > > > > This page tells otherwise: > > > > https://packages.debian.org/jessie/claws-mail > > > > OK, it's 'libdbus-1-3', not 'dbus' dependency, but libdbus-1-3 > > recommends dbus. > > > > Reco > > > > > I think, based on the words used, Brian means "depends" not "recommends" > i.e.:- > apt-get --no-install-recommends install claws-mail > will install claws-mail (and a host of other files) without libdbus
Thank you; that is a possible command I had in mind; there are other ways of going about it but all lead to getting claws-mail without dbus. Which once again raises the main question; what does systemd have to do with this? The original post gives an unexplained solution to a non-existent problem. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141018151412.go23...@copernicus.demon.co.uk