golinux wrote: > Would appreciate comments on this observation: > > "Look at the source code (while you're at it, note who are the > upstream maintainers of util-linux). Even they (so far) allow > compilation without systemd. It is Debian who are introducing systemd > dependencies even where it is actually optional in the upstream > source." > > > If upstream is allowing choice, why is Debian cutting it off? Maybe > I'm missing something . . .
The fact that an executable is linked against a systemd library doesn't automatically mean you have to run systemd as PID1. This is especially true for the sd-daemon and sd-journal libraries in this case. Laurent Bigonville > > > golinux > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
