2014/12/12 21:08 <berenger.mo...@neutralite.org>: > > > > Le 12.12.2014 13:05, Andrei POPESCU a écrit : > >> On Jo, 11 dec 14, 17:33:51, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote: >>> >>> Plus, it's not portable >>> (anyone have seen dbus on windows? not sure, but I doubt it's on *BSD, too) >>> unlike sockets. >> >> >> From http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/dbus/ >> >> D-Bus is very portable to any Linux or UNIX flavor, and a port to >> Windows is in progress. >> >> Kind regards, >> Andrei > > > Nice to learn about that, and sorry for wrong assumption. > Does someone use it on a non-linux based computer? Any experience about that would be appreciated. >
FWIW, openbsd has an implementation of a "dbus" daemon just for the dbus dependent apps to talk to. It's not the dbus that you download from freedesktop.org, of course. -- Joel Rees Computer memory is just fancy paper, CPUs just fancy pens. All is a stream of text flowing from the past into the future.