Hello again and thanks for the suggestions. I cannot use the same name because scim is not sc with some new features, nor is an improvement over it, its just another application. It should be entirely compatible with sc, but in the inside, is a completely different app.
> El 23/02/2015, a las 11:32, Liam O'Toole <[email protected]> escribió: > >> On 2015-02-23, Petter Adsen <[email protected]> wrote: >> --Sig_/rpAzsNcN+cDo.tN.Ondk0c6 >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >> >> On Mon, 23 Feb 2015 13:52:29 +0000 (UTC) >> Liam O'Toole <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Anyway, regardless of the terminology, simply to appropriate the name >>> "sc" might be perceived as bad manners. I would encourage the OP to >>> attempt to contact the former developers(s) first if he or she wishes >>> to use that name. >> >> Or, if that fails, what about "sc2"? >> >> Petter > > Indeed. Or perhaps "sc-ng". > > -- > > Liam > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] > Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected] > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
