On Wed 25 Feb 2015 at 12:31:05 +0000, Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Wednesday 25 February 2015 12:10:05 Brian wrote: > > On Wed 25 Feb 2015 at 11:20:20 +0000, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > > On Wednesday 25 February 2015 10:11:51 Curt wrote: > > > > On 2015-02-25, Brian <a...@cityscape.co.uk> wrote: > > > > > CUPS has not provided information about them them because it gets its > > > > > information from the Duplex option in the PPD file. The brother PPD > > > > > does not provide such an option. There is no bug. > > > > > > > > Then I can't understand why Gene said he could print a test page in > > > > duplex using the brother PPD after setting the duplex option as a > > > > default in the web interface. > > > > > > I didn't understand him so to say. :-/ I thought that he said that he > > > couldn't print duplex at all at the moment. If it isn't in the PPD then > > > that explains it. > > > > The facility to print duplex *is* in the PPD. Displaying this information > > in the GTK and Qt print dialogues is a different matter. > > I'm lost now. > > > > > > CUPS has not provided information about them them because it gets its > > > > > information from the Duplex option in the PPD file. The brother PPD > > > > > does not provide such an option. > > > The facility to print duplex *is* in the PPD. > > Both from you. Could you explain?
Have you looked in the PPD to see whether (a) the "Duplex" option is here (b) the facility to print duplex is present? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/25022015125439.cdf5bb7d9...@desktop.copernicus.demon.co.uk
