On Friday 06 March 2015 23:15:12 Gene Heskett wrote: > On Friday 06 March 2015 15:22:21 Miles Fidelman wrote: > > Brian wrote: > > > On Fri 06 Mar 2015 at 09:27:23 -0800, Patrick Bartek wrote: > > >> On Fri, 06 Mar 2015, Ken Heard wrote: > > >>> Thanks everybody for the collected wisdom. So for me now Jessie > > >>> RC1 is it. > > >> > > >> FYI: Do daily updates using dist-upgrade, instead of upgrade (or > > >> the equivalent with aptitude, if you use that). Things change > > >> quickly and sometimes majorly on the path to Stable. You'll want > > >> to get ALL those changes -- minor and major. "Upgrade" won't do > > >> that. This is recommended by Debian. Once Jessie is Stable, revert > > >> to "upgrade" for the most part. > > > > > > I agree with everything but the final sentence. Stable is unlikely > > > to pull in any new packages but if it does you will likely need > > > them. In other words, 'dist-upgrade' should be the norm for stable. > > > > Somehow, anything that needs daily updates, or upgrades, does not meet > > any definition of "stable" that I'm familiar with. > > > > Miles Fidelman
It doesn't. I would say it needs weekly updates. And ir has been said ot be "stable enough for general use" not "stable". It's not teh sam ehting. Lisi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/201503070006.06635.lisi.re...@gmail.com