On Wednesday 11 March 2015 16:34:15 David Wright wrote: > Quoting Lisi Reisz ([email protected]): > > On Wednesday 11 March 2015 15:46:55 David Wright wrote: > > > Quoting Bret Busby ([email protected]): > > > > I have now found that, against my wishes, the Linux installations > > > > were done as "legacy BIOS" installations, instead of UEFI/GPT > > > > installations, so I now have a system that (after repairing the nasty > > > > PC-BSD installation damage) kind of works, but, the UEFI/GPT part of > > > > the system, is not seen by the Linux part of the system. > > > > > > How did you express your wishes, and how did Debian contradict them? > > > It would help to file a bug report if there's a genuine problem, > > > especially at this time when the installer is having its problems > > > ironed out before its release. > > > > Debian *7*, David. Wheezy. It was released some time ago!! > > Touché. That just goes to show how much I prefer codenames to > release numbers!
I couldn't agree more. If all of Debian is to be known by numbers as some are suggesting I shall be in a constant muddle. :-( Lisi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
