On Tue 14 Apr 2015 at 15:32:47 +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 01:09:46PM -0500, David Wright wrote: > > Quoting Brian (a...@cityscape.co.uk): > > > On Mon 13 Apr 2015 at 12:00:52 -0500, David Wright wrote: > … > > > > So the most I could do is set up an account just to write "This list > > > > entry may mislead you" on the page. > … > > > You could do better than that :). It took half a minute to discover that > > > the "GNOME accessibility" entry needs removing or the entry adjusted to > > > reflect what version of Debian it applies to. Following the link is > > > sufficient to see why. > > I've fixed the gnome-core definition on that page in less time than it took to > read any of the last three messages in this sub-thread, and therefore > certainly > less time than it took to write them, using only information gleaned from > posts > in this thread. In other words, any one of you could have done it just as > well.
There is no arguing with that; we are pleased you found the information useful. This is an excellent example illustrating how the interaction between Debian users leads to a change and an improvement. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/14042015195638.cf199210d...@desktop.copernicus.demon.co.uk
