On 8/1/2015 1:30 AM, Andrew Wood wrote:
On 30/07/15 23:14, Arno Schuring wrote:
This configures an untagged connection, which is not the same as vlan
1. Also, there's no need to set that broadcast address manually, it's
inferred from the netmask.
auto eth1.2
iface eth1.2 inet static
address 192.168.100.254
netmask 255.255.255.0
vlan-raw-device eth1
I want vlan 1 to be the default hence I decared it as eth1 not eth1.1
That is most likely wrong. You set a "default interface" by configuring
the default gateway with the lowest metric. Other than that, there's no
"default" between network interfaces.
Im not talking about the default route Im talking about how it should
handle ethernet frames with no vlan tag arriving on eth1
Before going any further, you should know that having tagged and
untagged frames on the same port is far from best practices. You either
want to have a port be an untagged member of a single vlan, or a tagged
member of one or more vlans. It's hard to tell at this point if that's
what's actually causing the problem or if that's unrelated.
Matt Ventura
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/55bd657e.7060...@mattventura.net