Bob Bernstein writes: > With that as background, here is my question/request: is anyone aware > of a spirited defence of our ideal method of "selective quoting," (for > lack of a better label) one, say, that perhaps has achieved the status > of a "net classic?" Surely some 'net genius has dealt these > nay-sayers, who seem to LIKE top-posting, a solid uppercut?
Waste of effort. The usual reason for top-posting (or bottom-posting without editing) is laziness. -- John Hasler [email protected] Elmwood, WI USA
