I was going to respond to the original post privately, as my thoughts are
off topic, but at this point, I think I need to do it publicly.
While pornography and its attendant portrayal of women, children, and even
men as sex objects encourage all manner of perverse behaviors, I don't
that think non-sexual abuse of women by men is one of them (it's not like
readers of "Playgirl" are thought to be more inclined to commit violence
against men than others). Rather, the latter appears to be more related
to cultural attitudes that glorify bullying and physical punishment of
perceived slights as "manly", and despise appeals to reason and compassion
as weak and effeminate; combined with a general contempt for women
(beautiful or not) as weaklings and inferiors. Thus, while removing
sexually provacative pictures from collections of clip art *might*
discourage perverse sexual behavior to a very modest extent, it is
unlikely to reduce the number of wife-beaters. Treating the latter and
other bullies as the common criminals they are, and ceasing to make
excuses for them (together with teaching boys from a young age to respect
girls and women and protect them from violence) would do a lot more.
--------------------------|
John L. Ries |
Salford Systems |
Phone: (619)543-8880 x107 |
or (435)867-8885 |
--------------------------|
On Thu, 31 Dec 2015, John Hasler wrote:
Javier Barroso writes:
As workaround, you can create a dpkg config file on
/etc/dpkg/dpkg.cfg.d/ (maybe called openclipart2-exclusions) with:
path-exclude /usr/share/openclipart2/png/gustavorezende/gustavorezende_Wom*
path-exclude /usr/share/openclipart2/png/....
Then do apt-get --reinstall install openclipart2 , and files listed
there should not be installed
But that does not achieve the OP's goal, which is to prevent anyone from
installing those files.
Perhaps the OP should create openclipart2forprudes and try to get it
packaged.
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA