On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 20:36:39 -0700
David Christensen <dpchr...@holgerdanske.com> wrote:

> On 09/09/2016 11:51 AM, Celejar wrote:
> > On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 18:57:02 -0700
> > David Christensen <dpchr...@holgerdanske.com> wrote:
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> >> My laptop has 802.11 a/b/g WiFi and Fast Ethernet.  Wireless data
> >> transfers are slow (~50 Mbps).  Wired is twice as fast (100 Mbps); still
> >> slow.  Newer WiFi (n, ac) should be faster, but only the newest WiFi
> >> hardware can match or beat Gigabit.
> > 
> > You get ~50Mbps over a/b/g? 54Mbps is the theoretical maximum, and
> > everything I've read says that 20-24Mbps is the real-world maximum.
> > 
> > Celejar
> > 
> 
> Benchmarking using WiFi (48 Mb/s):
> 
>     2016-09-09 20:18:51 dpchrist@t7400 ~
>     $ time dd if=/dev/urandom of=urandom.100M bs=1M count=100
>     100+0 records in
>     100+0 records out
>     104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 12.6709 s, 8.3 MB/s

...

>     2016-09-09 20:19:32 dpchrist@t7400 ~
>     $ time scp -p urandom.100M samba:.
>     urandom.100M
> 
> 
>                           100%  100MB   1.5MB/s   01:08
> 
>     real      1m16.023s
>     user      0m4.548s
>     sys       0m0.744s
> 
> 
> So, 1048576900 bytes * 8 bits / byte / 76.024 seconds
> 
> = 110341671 bits/second

So assuming that '9' is a typo, as per another message of yours in this
thread, your actual throughput is more like 11Mpbs, correct?

Celejar

Reply via email to