I can´t understand this Discussion, as Normal user I even had not known that there are more than one Init System (SystemV) and I don´t think that this should be chooseable. The Installation is complicated enough dont make it more complex by adding choices which no one understands.
By the way I am using Linux since 20Years. For me personally there is no Problem in Installing another Init after Installation Therefore I don´t think it is needed as long everything is running fine. I am using systemd and beeing perfectly happy with it had only to do with it one time as I configured on access scan with clamd what is not the most important thing too I think. Please end this Diskussion and get on with important things. Am 13.03.2017 um 20:40 schrieb Patrick Bartek: > The Linux mantra has always been "choice," plethoras of choices. So why > at install time, is there no choice for the init system? You get what > the developers decide. Yes, you can install a new one -- I've done it > and it works -- but only after the install. It'd be a lot easier, if > there were a choice to begin with just like whether you want a GUI and > which one. > > Now, I know with LFS, you get to choose everything, etc. But is a > choice of init at install time so outrageous that no one ever > considered it or is it technically unfeasible or something else. > > Just curious. > > B Till then, -- -=============================== Jan-Peter Rühmann & Kuma ===============================- Gubkower Str.7 [ Tel.: +49 (38205) 65484 ] jan-pe...@ruehmann.name 18195 Prangendorf [ FAX: +49 (38205) 65212 ] http://www.ruehmann.name [ Tel.: +49 (38205) 65215 ] [ Mobil: +49 (162) 1316054 ] IT-Servicetechniker Skype: jan-peter_ruehmann / ICQ: 288192920 / WhatsApp: 491621316054 / Twitter: @JPRuehmann -========================================================================================- Die Verwendung der Daten zu Werbezwecken ist verboten.
