On 01/12/17 22:59, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote:
On 01.12.2017 22:19, Michael Biebl wrote:
I think it might be useful to open a (wishlist) bug report against the
linux package to not add the recommends when building for stretch-backports
Isn't AppArmor required in buster and also required in stretch-backports
linux-image? Of course AppArmor can be disabled completely or partially
if profile for some application is broken, but it is not just
recommended package now.
Yes, if I'm pretty sure it wasn't just recommended, but it was
required--if I remember right I had no choice.
