On 2018-01-19, Thomas Schmitt <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Curt wrote: >> What is the difference between your output and the OP's? > > [email protected] reported with one of the checksum file pairs: > >> > $ gpg --verify SHA512SUMS.sign SHA512SUMS >> > ... >> > gpg: BAD signature from "Debian CD signing key >> > <[email protected]>" [unknown]
Sorry, I failed to see the 'BAD' right before my eyes. > The good ones were MD5SUMS, SHA1SUMS, and SHA256SUMS. > > >> Just the "[unknown]" after <[email protected]>? > > This seems to be a statement by younger gpg versions. I see this on my > Sid VM. > -- “True terror is to wake up one morning and discover that your high school class is running the country.” – Kurt Vonnegut
