On 25 January 2018 at 09:50, Michael Lange <klappn...@freenet.de> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 09:15:59 +0000
> Michael Fothergill <michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >
> > >
> > > I have the same problem as in Gentoo.
> > >
> > > In order to install gcc 7.3 rc2 I think I would need to be sid.
> > >
> > >
> > > I don't think I want to be sid at present.
> > >
> >
> > ​But if I did want to be sid, would a source file like this suffice:
> >
> > ​
> > deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free
> > deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free
> >
> > ​or do I need more?
> >
> > ​If I become sid then I think I would just install the gcc version above
> > the one I have and  then reinstall
> > the 4.15.0 kernel and maybe I would have the full kernel
> > patch.............
>
> hmm, I don't think installing the latest compiler does any good if you
> install a kernel package that was compiled with an older compiler version.
>
> And from a quick glance it looks like sid still has only gcc-7.2 .
> There is a gcc-8 package in experimental though; from again a quick
> glance at the dependencies it surely won't easily install on stretch but
> it might be worth a try if it installs on buster.
>

​I tried installing gcc 8 on buster.   It needs cpp8 which needs ​libmrpfr6

ie this

https://packages.debian.org/unstable/main/libmpfr6

which looks like its about being sid again.​


​I need to go to dependency rehab and sing the dem bones song again.

Suggestions on avoiding becoming sid/krankenhaus/unstable/12 step program
welcome.

Regards

MF


 ​


> Then I guess you would have to compile the kernel from source, which
> actually isn't too hard with make-kpkg (however I never tried to force
> make-kpkg to use a certain, non-system-default compiler, but that's surely
> possible).
>
> Regards
>
> Michael
>
>
> .-.. .. ...- .   .-.. --- -. --.   .- -. -..   .--. .-. --- ... .--. . .-.
>
> Every living thing wants to survive.
>                 -- Spock, "The Ultimate Computer", stardate 4731.3
>
>

Reply via email to