On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 07:18:40AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 08:44:10PM +0000, Kleene, Steven (kleenesj) wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > In fact I obsessively viewed all 386 xpm files on the whole system. None
> > other than /usr/share/pixmaps/mini.xterm_48x48.xpm matched the icon
> > displayed.
>
> Not really on-topic, but perhaps helpful: next time you do a
>
> find ... -type f -name "*.xpm" -exec md5sum {} + | sort
>
> or something (replace md5sum with sha5sum if you fear your machine
> will be hacked [1] ;^P
>
> Identical files will be sorted next to each other.
>
> Cheers
>
> [1] This is to pre-empt discussions about whether md5sum is "less
> secure" than say, sha512sum :-)
<sarcasm=ofof humour=no literal=“yesss my precious”>
No, sha5sum is definitely waaay too primitive - butterfly wings and
cosmic radiation eddies are a must for those ackshually, you know,
like, want axshul security. Like.
