Matthew Crews <mailingli...@mattcrews.com> writes: > > Here is a good talk on the subject by Michael Lucas, one of the premier > experts on ZFS. Its worth noting that a lot of the concepts apply to > BTRFS to varying degrees: > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9A0dX2WqW8
I don't have time yet, I think I will watch the whole thing later the week. But I hate the ZFS pushing going around, I think it's a almost fine idea from the technical standpoint, it will work if you decide to use it, but I surely don't trust the commercial parties behind ZFS as - they have acted malicious in the past, - cost us in the linux community a whole lot of energy with that lawsuit - were bought by the most twisting corporation which put Microsofts embrace, extend and extinguish campaigns back on the amateur level. I would never put my business on ZFS, I'd always go the "more backups, and maybe less perfect GPL solution" route. I would really like if the hostile Linux patchset would be off-topic here and sorry BSD guys, while I know that there were (or are) things like debian-kfreebsd, but I'm just your average (A/L)GPL-fanboy which only grudgingly accepts BSD licensed code. Because FSFs license protects me better as a developer and as a user, is a non-malicous cancer from my point of view. And yes, the FSF GFDL is a mistake. Peter