On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 10:35:05AM -0300, Francisco M Neto wrote: > On Tue, 2019-07-02 at 12:23 -0400, Default User wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2019, 05:38 Dave Sherohman <d...@sherohman.org> wrote: > > > I think the core misunderstanding here is that you seem to be assuming > > > that, when a new stable comes out, a new unstable is created to go with > > > it. > > Well... maybe? I mean, certain developers or maintainers may be aware of > the release cycle and delay their uploads into unstable until after the new > stable is released. In that case, Sid should experience an unusually high > number > of updates over the next few weeks.
Yes, true, there will be (are?) a lot of new uploads to unstable in the wake of the new stable release, but my impression was that the OP might have been thinking that stretch-unstable is going to be discontinued and replaced with a brand new buster-unstable (based on the stable buster release), which isn't the case. sid remains sid forever and will never be replaced with a different unstable. -- Dave Sherohman