Hi, 13 juin 2020 à 21:14 de recovery...@enotuniq.net:
> You're looking at the wrong header. It's X-Spam-Status and > X-Amavis-Spam-Status you should worry about. Authetication-Results is > set by your MTA receiving your own mail from the list. > > But yes, they are both OK for this and your previous e-mails. > Ok, thanks but still confusing... > Which one of these is under your control btw, w3.tutanota.de or > w4.tutanota.de? > None, these are domains from my email provider. I don't own any email infrastructure myself... 14 juin 2020 à 17:13 de deb...@lionunicorn.co.uk: > On Sat 13 Jun 2020 at 16:05:17 (+0200), l0f...@tuta.io wrote: > >> Thanks, I was not aware of this. >> However, this extra ">" should have been deleted upon viewing the email, no? >> > How would the viewer's email client know whether the > in > >From had been added by some such scheme as above and should > be removed, or was a genuine occurrence in the original email? > If ">" was intentional, then it could have been escaped with an additional ">". See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mbox#Family: " >From my point of view... In the mboxo format, such lines have irreversible ambiguity. In the mboxo format, this can lead to corruption of the message. If a line already contained >From at the beginning (such as in a quotation), it is unchanged when written. When subsequently read by the mail software, the leading > is erroneously removed. The mboxrd format solves this by converting From to >From and converting >From to >>From , etc. The transformation is then always reversible." l0f4r0