Hi, 16 juin 2020 14:50 de recovery...@enotuniq.net:
> And *now* it gets interesting. Because what's came to the list was text: > > Message-ID: <m9j2pgk--...@tuta.io> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Can we imagine that the ML simply 64-decodes the email and resent it as text/plain? 16 juin 2020 16:30 de deb...@lionunicorn.co.uk: > It might be easier for people to follow the substance of this thread > if you posted in such a way as to include one simple self-descriptive > test in each post, and not include all the deeply-nested "noise" like > the above. So, for example, you could write: > > >From foo. This line was written with a leading unescaped From, "From ". > > >From bar. This line was written with a leading escaped From, ">From ". > > You could, in addition, include a file attachment of the test as written. > Good suggestion. > You might also wish to omit/change your Attribution line temporarily, > because it prevents your tests from ever consisting entirely of 7-bit > ASCII, owing to its "à". > What's the consequence of it please? > These little things might help clarify your reports of the distorting > effects of a medium, when those reports are subject to the same > potential distortion. > Yes, it's not always easy to communicate efficiently & clearly by email ;) Best regards, l0f4r0
