Hi, 30 mars 2021, 08:16 de andreimpope...@gmail.com:
> $ rmadison linux-signed-amd64 > linux-signed-amd64 | 4.19.118+2+deb10u1~bpo9+1 | stretch-backports | source > linux-signed-amd64 | 4.19.171+2 | stable | source > linux-signed-amd64 | 4.19.181+1 | stable | source > linux-signed-amd64 | 5.9.15+1~bpo10+1 | buster-backports | source > linux-signed-amd64 | 5.10.13+1~bpo10+1 | buster-backports | source > linux-signed-amd64 | 5.10.19+1~bpo10+1 | backports-policy | source > linux-signed-amd64 | 5.10.24+1 | testing | source > linux-signed-amd64 | 5.10.24+1 | unstable | source > Is linux-signed-amd64 the source of linux-image-amd64? I suppose there are some constraints here but it would be (apparently) easier if the names were matching ^^ If I follow you, we have more information by inquiring about the source package than the binary one? > The packages appears to be stuck in the backports-policy. If I recall > correctly (see recent -backports archives) this is related to the > freeze. > Very interesting. You have certainly something here... But if true, why https://lists.debian.org/debian-backports-changes/2021/03/msg00053.html mentions "Accepted linux 5.10.19-1~bpo10+1 (source) into buster-backports->backports-policy, buster-backports" if it's just in backports-policy? Indeed, as soon as I see "buster-backports" mentioned, I expect the package to be available through...(drum roll)... buster-backports. 30 mars 2021, 16:14 de deb...@lionunicorn.co.uk: > On Sun 28 Mar 2021 at 19:46:07 (+0200), > l0f...@tuta.io> wrote: > >> >> By the way, what is image-5.10.0-0.bpo.4* serie for?Is it only related to >> "Change ABI number to 0.bpo.4"? Do I need that? >> > I guess you have to read the changes file to find that out. > https://lists.debian.org/debian-backports-changes/2021/03/msg00053.html > might be of use here. > Actually, what I need is just linux-image-5.10.0-0.bpo.4-amd64 but it hasn't been made available yet. This one will be related to kernel 5.10.19-1~bpo10+1. > Perhaps it's worth subscribing to debian-backports-changes and > debian-backports. You can post to the latter. > That's a good suggestion, thanks :) Best regards, l0f4r0