Am Tue, 2 Aug 2022 23:02:12 +0000 schrieb Andy Smith <a...@strugglers.net>:
> Why do you believe that having their customer premises equipment do > this for v6 is any different from having it do default NAT for v4? It is additional work and it breaks certain protocols. IPv6 doesn't need NAT, so why should an ISP do it? I understand SPI firewalls to protect the customer and don't allow servers inside, but NAT isn't something that is needed to reach that. Additionally, I have NEVER seen a provider that does NAT or IPv6 yet.
