Citát Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 07:08:16AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Citát Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 04:16:45AM +0100, Martin Helas wrote: > > > > did i miss something, or has there been no package update in non-US > > > > since 20th of November? > > > > > > Correct. It's low priority to fix, since non-US is essentially a > > > graveyard anyway. > > > > What do you mean exactly when you say that it is a "graveyard anyway"? > > From what I read it is the "recommended-more secure version". Isn`t > > it? > > Since before the release of woody, DFSG-free cryptographic software has > been legal to distribute from the main archive in the US, so most > packages that used to be in non-US have migrated there. The only ones > left are those in contrib or non-free, those with unresolved licensing > problems, those whose maintainers haven't been paying attention, or > both. > > > So what is the difference? Which version to use? > > There are no name clashes between main and non-US as far as I know, so > this question should never arise. > > Cheers, > > -- > Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > thanx for explanation, see I got a different impression when I was looking for a distro in October 2003. Sorry that I asked, but I did not know. (I don`t know lots of thinks and I wish I would with my getting old and lazy brain). ed. > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
