Hans wrote: > Hi folks, > > during the last moonths I get more mails from the debian-user list marked as > spam than before. Something must have changed. > > I examined the header of the mails, but did not see any unusual. > > Below I send the header of an example of such a mail, maybe you can see the > reason? > > On my computer I am also using spamassassin, and my own score is set to 3.4, > so even so it should not considered as spam. > > X-Spam-Flag: YES > X-SPAM-FACTOR: DKIM
What sets these two headers? > Authentication-Results: mail104c50.megamailservers.eu; > dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (4096-bit key) > header.d=4angle.com header.i=@4angle.com header.b="bS+3bWmq" That's the source of the DKIM fail. > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on bendel.debian.org > X-Spam-Level: > X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.7 required=4.0 tests=BODY_INCLUDES_PACKAGE, > > DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,LDO_WHITELIST, > T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no > version=3.4.2 This is debian.org's mailserver checking for spam and deciding that it isn't, even though DKIM is invalid. > X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.debian.org with policy bank en-ht > X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.561 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 > tests=[BAYES_00=-2, BODY_INCLUDES_PACKAGE=-2, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, > DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, > LDO_WHITELIST=-5, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] > autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no This is debian.org again. > X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.053994, version=1.2.5 > > --- snap --- > > Does one see any reason, why this is considered as spam??? Whatever set X-SPAM-FLAG: YES is probably at fault. -dsr-
