On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 6:05 PM Jeffrey Walton <noloa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 2:40 PM Richard <rrosn...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> You really must think of yourself as being the epitome of human creation. >> I don't see any use in continuing this nonsense. If you don't have anything >> relevant to say, this case is closed for me. >> > > Who are you talking about? There are two people in the reply below. > Gene IS the epitome of human creation. > >> Am Di., 14. Mai 2024 um 16:55 Uhr schrieb gene heskett < >> ghesk...@shentel.net>: >> >>> On 5/14/24 10:09, Richard wrote: >>> > Just because something isn't an official ISO standard doesn't mean >>> it's >>> > not standard behavior. And how it relates to this mailing list? It's >>> > called a setting. >>> > >>> No its not, its your refusal to use the down arrow in your reply editor >>> to put your reply after the question. It really is that simple. If your >>> choice of email agents cannot do that, its time to switch to an agent >>> that can. There are dozens of them. >>> >>> > Am Di., 14. Mai 2024 um 15:57 Uhr schrieb Loris Bennett >>> > <loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de <mailto:loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de>>: >>> > >>> > Hi Richard, >>> > >>> > Richard <rrosn...@gmail.com <mailto:rrosn...@gmail.com>> writes: >>> > >>> > > "Top posting" (writing the answer above the text that's being >>> replied >>> > > to) is literally industry standard behavior. >>> > >>> > Can you provide a link to the standard you are referring to? >>> > >>> > Assuming such a standard exists, how would it apply to this >>> newsgroup? >>> > >>> > [snip (51 lines)] >>> > >>> > Cheers, >>> > >>> > Loris >>> >>> Cheers, Gene Heskett, CET. >>> >>
