<[email protected]> wrote: ... > I don't think that was Andy's intention. Formally the list > is still unmoderated (or crowd-moderated, if you wish).
i can only go by actions and cannot always figure out intent. :) > I think the formal machinery (GR, etc) is misplaced here. maybe, but i find the word "strict" to be too harsh as that to me implies some level of commitment that perhaps even Andy isn't going to be able to consistently back up and yes i would consider such moderation to be overstepping the project guidelines. songbird
