On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 2:27 PM Michael Paoli <[email protected]> wrote:
> And there's no reason to attempt to execute a named pipe.
> But, well, if we do ...:
> Either way, peeking bit more with strace(1) ...
> execve("./p", ...) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied)
> Either way, the kernel stubbornly and appropriately refuses to allow
> execution of a named pipe.
And yes, very much as it ought. From execve(2) we have:
ERRORS
EACCES The file or a script interpreter is not a regular file.
