On 05.02.2026 09:20 Uhr Tom Yates wrote: > On Wed, 4 Feb 2026, Marco Moock wrote: > > > On 03.02.2026 18:00 Uhr Tom Yates wrote: > > > >> Does anyone use this combination? I think I've found a bug in > >> pyspf-milter, but it may just be that i've failed to configure it > >> correctly, and thought I'd ask if anyone had any experience before > >> proceeding. > > > > I use it and I've also talked to the maintainer in the past. > > > > Please specify your issue and the version you are using. > > thank you so much! i'm on debian 12, using sendmail (8.17.1.9) and > pyspf-milter (3.0.4) from the standard repositories. > > my understanding was that, as long as localhost was defined as an > internal host:
The milter sees the IP of the connecting client and doesn't have that in InternalHosts. That's why sendmail's milter interface offers to tell the milter if the machine was authenticated successfully. > $ grep -i internal /etc/pyspf-milter/pyspf-milter.conf > InternalHosts = 127.0.0.1 > > mail from remote users who had authenticated via SMTP AUTH for the > purposes of using me as a MSA would not fall foul of SPF filtering. > however, this doesn't seem to be the case. I know this issue. Please talk to the programmer of the milter. This needs to be fixed upstream. https://pymilter.org/ [email protected] As I only use that milter to add the Authentication-Results line, I can ignore it. -- kind regards Marco Send spam to [email protected]
