Teemu Likonen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ah, and btw: Please don't change things [...]
> And please, please do not add [...]
If that's all that you can read in my mail (as you only quoted this irrelevant
portions of my text), a good option would maybe to save your breath and don't
answer at all.
This is Debian users' mailing list
Correct. And I asked other users and answered to users. So what's the problem
here?
Developers typically are also users so chances are high that also developers
are present here. At least that's what I thought. And that's also the reasons I
included additional[sic] information in my mail, just in case. If you have no
use for it, you can safely ignore it.
Yet, if Debian developers really are no longer also users, this would indeed
explain several things. *scnr*
In my previous message I (a user) tried to
help you (a user) to understand why .pgp is logical file extension for
OpenPGP certificates (public keys).
And my answer is that (and explained why) this is a bad idea in this case.
Better audience for your "please do not's" would be Debian developers
and package maintainers. You could report a wishlist-tagged bug report
for relevant packages: release-notes, debian-archive-keyring. This can
be done with "reportbug" command.
That's a good point and already known to me. My intention was to pre-check if
this really is a bug or if there is some better explanation. You indeed have a
good explanation why this change probably was done in Debian and I even dropped
a hint here why this happened now, but this explanation hardens my impression
that this really is a bug in the release-notes.
(in detail, the following commit just 6 days ago:
https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/release-notes/-/commit/25a00766680d8131fc71f3ba3c502d3e87692fdf
)
Thanks
hede
