On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 at 08:48:49AM -0600, Andrew Latham wrote: > Haines > > So looking at > https://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/archive/3.1_r8/i386/iso-cd/ > for example I see an obvious dat difference in the files.
Do you mean date difference between the ISO and the SHA256SUMS? > So > https://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/archive/3.1_r8/i386/iso-cd/debian-31r8-i386-netinst.iso > shows for me: > sha1sum debian-31r8-i386-netinst.iso > 1ae919b97c0d5e55f45c7910f4aaa7b775df75da debian-31r8-i386-netinst.iso > > md5sum debian-31r8-i386-netinst.iso > ab486a76a9362a21054575624fead93f debian-31r8-i386-netinst.iso > > sha256sum debian-31r8-i386-netinst.iso > 5cee250e89b2993cf9053c74602868f45b6d1b1386d41803dba42c6622a4558e > debian-31r8-i386-netinst.iso > > sha512sum debian-31r8-i386-netinst.iso > 27fd844d31cce01a9b06401d1672fcdbdefda9f550554728d6fb28216b3317ecd3eca29f5ae79c1f464e631e644816e6f2a667b4935865513d6b532e7852db7c > debian-31r8-i386-netinst.iso > > I would raise the point that ALL the checksums are incorrect and the 8 > year date range is at issue. So what do you infer from that fact? -- Haines Brown
