Hi everyone,

thanks for your feedback. For context, I am using a slightly older board 
(gigabyte arous elite v1). I had initially thought just to ignore it, however 
then (and re-enforced by your feedback) I have pinned this to being responsible 
for some system crashes I experienced with my wifi/GPU having conflicting 
regions logged .

While I have worked around this by changing the wifi initialisation settings, I 
am worried this will still come up to bite me in the future.

I am thinking to try

>> - acpi_osi=Linux

first if the kernel is currently ignoring the message, as it may be needed for 
this function to be called / work correctly. I had initially just been ignoring 
it until I pinned this down to being underlying cause of my graphics card not 
initialising correctly - was a lot of starring at logs to get to that 
conclusion and put them together!

Kind regards,

Ryan

Sent with [Proton Mail](https://pr.tn/ref/64KQPP9W) secure email.

On Monday, 6 April 2026 at 19:41, Cliff Hayes <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm not sure this is anything to be really concerned about, but you might be 
> able to clear the ACPI warning by inserting the following into your GRUB boot 
> params - "acpi_enforce_resources=lax"
>
> Looks like the BIOS and Linux kernel are battling over some memory allocation.
>
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
>
> acpi_enforce_resources=       [ACPI]
>                       { strict | lax | no }
>                       Check for resource conflicts between native drivers
>                       and ACPI OperationRegions (SystemIO and SystemMemory
>                       only). IO ports and memory declared in ACPI might be
>                       used by the ACPI subsystem in arbitrary AML code and
>                       can interfere with legacy drivers.
>                       strict (default): access to resources claimed by ACPI
>                       is denied; legacy drivers trying to access reserved
>                       resources will fail to bind to device using them.
>                       lax: access to resources claimed by ACPI is allowed;
>                       legacy drivers trying to access reserved resources
>                       will bind successfully but a warning message is logged.
>                       no: ACPI OperationRegions are not marked as reserved,
>                       no further checks are performed.
>
> As for the "firmware bug", that appears to be a remnant from an old check 
> that BIOS programmers used to see if someone is running Linux. Modern Linux 
> kernels ignore the request which is what I believe is being reported there.
>
> You can "quiet down" these errors, if you want, by changing 
> GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT to "quiet loglevel=3". That's going to only show 
> messages that hit level 3 and not BIOS warnings which should be level 4.
>
> What motherboard and BIOS version are you using?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, April 6, 2026 5:48 AM
> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> Subject: Bump: Re: Help request: BIOS Bug: ACPI: [Firmware Bug]: BIOS 
> _OSI(Linux) query ignored
>
> Hi guys,
>
> sorry to bump this one up but would appreciate a bit of guidance its stressng 
> me out!
>
> thanks
>
> Sent from [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/mail/home) for Android.
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> On Sunday, 04/05/26 at 13:18 [email protected] wrote:
>
>> Hi team,
>>
>> I have seen this error from day one on my system, however ignored it until 
>> (when my wifi and GPU were agressively competing for memory allocation) 
>> caused black screen until I stabilised the wifi up/down...
>>
>> ACPI Warning: SystemIO range 0x...B00-0x...B08 conflicts with OpRegion ... 
>> (\GSA1.SMBI)
>> ACPI: [Firmware Bug]: BIOS _OSI(Linux) query ignored
>>
>> While resolved for now worried this could cause an issue in the future. I 
>> have seen various ideas and solutions online, inc setting:
>>
>> -  acpi_osi=Linux
>> -
>>
>> acpi_osi=!
>>
>> -
>>
>> acpi_osi="Windows 2009"
>>
>> etc.
>>
>> Is this something you have encountered? Anyone have any suggestions?
>>
>> thanks!

Reply via email to