On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 18:17:01 +0100 (CET), Pedro Hernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> --- Johann Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > On Thursday > January 22 at 08:34am > > Hugo Vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Question I have: who would think of searching for "miserable > > failure", > > > or perhaps does Google leak its hidden motives? Or are they? > > > > Google has a rating system, that is partially based on how many > > people > > follow certain links when searching for certain things. Therefore, > > if people search for 'miserable failure' and go through the results > > (or send google false/doctored urls, etc) and click GW's site, it > > raises the > > points for said site for said search. Now, if a lot of people do > > this, > > they can move it all the way up to #1 (which is why 'I'm feeling > > lucky > > goes to it) > > So how come that searching for 'miserable failure' lists a page (GWB > bio) as number one, when that page contains none of the words in the > search? Is that becaus people "send google false/doctored urls" > (whatever that means)? ..or, could it be a sign from God? ;-) -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]