On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 08:42:22AM -0600, Sean Reifschneider wrote: > You don't say which version you are running, there have been a lot of subtle > issues with the adoption that I've fixed
Wish: a time saver. Example of time saving is skipping messages in a email thread. Please, pretty please, reply below previous text. > On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 7:30 AM Anssi Saari wrote: > > Sean Reifschneider <[email protected]> writes: > > > > > In my testing, it's still very on track for a mid June 1.0 > > > release. I've run thousands of system installs and thousands of > > > apt update/upgrade cycles and the issues I've run into have been > > > addressed, 0.9.7 has been working great with no adoption failures > > > (the biggest issue I'd been running into; the adoption is the > > > trickiest part but also the most worthwhile WRT surviving DDoS). > > > > Well, in my little home network this was working but after a while I > > noticed unattended-updates hadn't updated and I got this with manual: > > > > # apt update > > Get:1 https://security.debian.org/debian-security bookworm-security > > InRelease [48.0 kB] > > Get:2 https://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm InRelease [151 kB] > > Reading package lists... Done > > E: Release file for > > > > https://security.debian.org/debian-security/dists/bookworm-security/InRelease > > is expired (invalid since 9d 10h 37min 0s). Updates for this repository > > will not be applied. > > > > Disabling the cache and running apt update fixed it but what could cause > > this? > > > > there have been a lot of subtle issues with the adoption that I've fixed > and the 0.10.4 release has been running really, really well for me. > If you ARE running 0.10.4, LMK and we can do further debugging. > > https://github.com/linsomniac/apt-cacher-ultra/releases/tag/0.10.4 > > I'd also start over with a new cache directory (save the "ca" > sub-directory): > > systemctl stop apt-cacher-ultra > cd /var/cache/apt-cacher-ultra > rm -rf cache* pool staging tmp > # update your package > systemctl start apt-cacher-ultra > > Thanks for providing the feedback. I'm considering the 0.10.4 to be a > RC2 for the 1.0 release. I found an issue with expiry of "fat" repos > (repos that list all historic versions of a package, docker and > elastic both do this) that I put some changes in for and I want to > let those soak for a while. > > I'd appreciate it if you gave 0.10.4 a try and let me know how > it works for you. Yes, being in contact with users / customers is a nice thing. Showing/presenting/leading "I'm a programmer, I know logic" gets more easy when writing in the discussion order. Regards Geert Stappers P.S. A compliment to Anssi Saari: Thanks for replying below previous text. It shows that you are aware that more people (try to) follow the discussion. And a plea to all: Reply below previous text, make skipping messages possible. -- Silence is hard to parse
